Although the Earth supports life, it has a mysterious carbon deficit. Compared with other bodies in the solar system the Earth has far less carbon than would be expected for a planet that supports life. Originally it was thought that in the inner region of the dust disc where the Earth formed, temperatures soared high enough for the carbon to boil away. However, observations of developing solar systems have now suggested that the temperature would not have been high enough. It is more likely that fire is to blame. Hot oxygen atoms would have readily combined with carbon, burning to produce carbon dioxide. There would have been fewer of these oxygen atoms further away from the Sun.
Which one of the following, if true, would most strengthen the above argument?
Full explanation
The passage argues that the Earth’s carbon deficit is likely due to carbon being burned by hot oxygen atoms (forming CO₂) in the early inner solar system — rather than carbon boiling away.
Analysis of the given options Option A : This suggests carbon arrived later, but doesn’t directly support the “burning by oxygen” idea.
Option B : This directly supports the argument: it suggests that farther from the Sun (where there would be fewer hot oxygen atoms), carbon is more abundant — which aligns perfectly with the idea that near the Sun, carbon was burned off.
Option C : Irrelevant to the cause of Earth’s carbon deficit.
Option D : Interesting, but it doesn’t support why Earth itself lost its carbon.
Option E : This weakens the old explanation but doesn’t directly support the new oxygen-burning idea.
Strengthening an argument means adding a new piece of evidence that makes its conclusion more likely to be true, by supporting the specific mechanism the argument relies on — not just any fact that sounds related to the topic. When an argument proposes a specific cause-and-effect chain (for example, “hot oxygen atoms burned away carbon near the Sun”), the strongest support is evidence that the pattern predicted by that mechanism (more oxygen nearby → less carbon; less oxygen further away → more carbon) actually shows up in the real data.